Our website uses cookies! You can disable them by changing your browser settings but if you carry on using the site we'll assume you don't mind! Read our privacy policy for more details.
Illustration by Aya Mobaydeen @aya_mobaydeen

Canada recognised Islamophobia, so why can’t the UK?

words by Imaan Asim

This month’s horrific attack on a Muslim family in Canada, which wiped out three generations leaving only a nine year old boy, was recognised by Justin Trudeau as an act of ‘terrorism’, along with an acknowledgement of Islamophobia existing in Canada. 

For Muslims around the world, this was a significant moment. Since 9/11, anti-Muslim sentiment has been used by politicians and welcomed as a way to gain public votes. The demonisation of Muslims is perpetuated by the top-down, through media and governments, which as we have seen, results in the murder of innocent people on the streets. The media utilises double standards in the reporting of attacks carried out by Muslims as terrorism and those typically by white people as lone wolves with mental health issues. Even with this murder in Canada, it wasn’t the killer’s name and mugshot which was plastered across the news: a photo of him running a marathon was featured instead.

The Sewell Report, a commission on race and ethnic disparities released in April 2021, came to the disturbing conclusion that institutional racism does not exist in the UK. This is contrary to countless accounts of lived experiences of racism, including my own. It was particularly galling after new figures had recently come out exposing how how young Black women are four times more likely to die in childbirth than their white counterparts, and how 60% of the first NHS doctors and nurses to die from COVID-19 were from our BAME communities, despite the NHS comprising only 20% BAME staff in total.

Illustration by Aya Mobaydeen @aya_mobaydeen

The outcome of the report, while disheartening, comes as no surprise. As a young Muslim girl,  when I applied to university I spoke about how institutional racism has affected me on my personal statement. My UCAS mentor said that there was ‘no such thing’ and advised me to take it out. Would this interaction have turned out differently if our government had a history of acknowledging and fighting against Islamophobia? Unfortunately, the track record of the latest line of Conservatives shows quite the opposite. Whilst Theresa May was in power, she rejected the definition of Islamophobia proposed to parliament; and despite Boris Johnson’s comments about Muslim women who wore burqas resembling ‘bank robbers’ and ‘letter boxes’, he was still elected Prime Minister. This sends a dangerous and sinister message – Islamophobia is not only unimportant, but acceptable. Our government not only turns a blind eye to racism, but speaks it into action by refusing to put in place legislation to eradicate it. 

We can draw parallels to the way Islamophobia and anti-Semitism is tackled by media and politicians, not to diminish the importance of either, but to notice disparities. In the 2019 General Election, anti-Semitism in the Labour party was one of the driving forces behind the smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn. While there were some well-founded and highly disturbing claims about anti-Jewish sentiment by some Labour members historically, this force was mainly due to Corbyn’s stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict. The ex-leader simply believed that the Israeli government should not be killing innocent Palestinians, or taking their land – a fault of the politicians, not the Jewish religion which Zionism co-opts for colonial gain. This can be compared to how people share a disdain for Saudi Arabia’s policies, but there was a general agreement not to conflate this with being Islamophobic. It is important to note that within this election, and in present times, the blatant hatred for Muslims by the Conservative party has not made mainstream media, drawing back to the concept of politicians dog-whistling racist comments towards right-wing voters who celebrate it as something to embrace. We can see this as the 2017 British Social Attitudes Survey showed that 33% of those who identify with the Conservative Party would describe themselves as somewhat racist, compared with 18% of those who identify with the Labour Party.

So why is it that Canada can recognise their Islamophobia, but the country I am from cannot? Since before becoming Prime Minister, Trudeau supported Muslims, whether it was the right for women to wear a niqab if they choose, or refusing to link terror attacks to Islam. However, perhaps even in Canada this support is only surface level. While in 2018, Canada increased aid to UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinians in the Near East); they still sold billions of dollars in weaponry and machinery used to massacre thousands of Muslims in Yemen and Palestine. This is also not the first time Trudeau has covertly funded the violence he publicly condemns. In 2019, Canada sold nearly C$3 billion of military equipment to Saudi Arabia, despite criticising their poor human rights. Therefore, it would seem Canada, although more outspoken than Britain, seems only to be defending its Muslim citizens with lip service. Condemning Islamophobic behaviour means very little if in the same breath you order the death warrant for Muslims outside Canada’s borders.  

Yet despite the long way Canada has to go, there’s no doubt that the public recognition of Islamophobia will have a positive ripple effect on its Muslim community and draw in international solidarity. The Sewell report and the ongoing hate speech used by our government shows that Britain is happy to ignore injustice. Publicly stating that racism exists is the first step to create actual progressive change and will not only come as a relief to those of us who have been campaigning for years, but send a message to the institutions which structurally perpetuate division and discrimination that this is not okay. 

Illustration by Aya Mobaydeen @aya_mobaydeen

See more of Aya’s work on instagram

More Stories
Kenmure Street: a rally against the “good” / “bad” migrant narrative